Re: Packages up for adoption

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 07:10 +1200, Michael J. Knox wrote:
> Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 07:32 +1200, Michael J. Knox wrote:
> > 
> >>Matthias Clasen wrote:
> >>
> >>>We plan to drop the standalone gdk-pixbuf and imlib packages from Core
> >>>before FC6, together with the rest of the Gnome 1 stack.
> >>>
> >>>There are probably some things in Extras that still require these,
> >>>therefore I put slightly cleaned up spec files and srpms up here:
> >>>
> >>>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194355
> >>>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194353
> >>>
> >>>If anybody feels like maintaining these in Extras, please step up.
> >>
> >>I don't know if these have been claimed yet, but I will take them on,
> >>bugzilla seems to be tossing up errors, so I can't check the reports.
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > Bugzilla is back up; oh, and imlib and gdk-pixbuf are being whacked from
> > Core for test1, so feel free to get them into Extras.
> 
> Cool, thanks.
> 
> My next question is, do these need a full review for inclusion in extras?

Jesse already gave it a look, and the spec files in the bugs include his
feedback. Don't know if thats formal enough...

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux