On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 04:32 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > buildsys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > >abiword: > > 5: 1:2.4.4-4.fc5 (FE5) > > 6: 1:2.4.4-2.fc6 (FE6) > > > > > Now that these reports include both FC and FE, shouldnt they be going > into fedora-maintainers or fedora-devel list instead of in here? Better > visibility hopefully gets things fixed faster. Yep, but I'm not sure about what's the best list for visibility. Perhaps fedora-maintainers is better than here; no docs recommend Extras contributors to subscribe to fedora-devel and I believe many don't read it (myself included). Changing the target or adding additional ones in the script is trivial and I can take care of it when it's clear where the report is wanted, but someone who has the rights needs to auto-whitelist/subscribe the sender (buildsys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) to those lists or let me know if there's another sender that should be used. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
