On 02/07/06, Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
yes, thanks for your comment, actually I was refering to the Guidelines in my first email. Sorry, that I did not make this clear. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-17396a3b06ec849a7c0c6fc3243673b17e5fed90 says that packages should not include their own version of a library. This is what OptiPNG does. Does this block OptiPNG from beeing added to Extras?
Yes, I believe that is a blocker. You could package it to use the currently packaged version of that library though. Or convince upstream OptiPNG folks to move to using the upstream library, submitting their patches if necessary. What library is it that they include? Jonathan -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
