On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 04:06:36PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 12:13 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Paul Howarth (paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > > buildsys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > >azureus: > > > > 5: 0:2.4.0.3-0.20060529cvs_1.fc5 > > > > 6: 0:2.4.0.3-0.20060328cvs_5.fc6 > > > > > > ... > > > > > > Perhaps the script could be enhanced to take into account packages that > > > have migrated from Core to Extras and vice versa? I know that one of my > > > packages has a broken upgrade path like this. > > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191686 > > > > Heck, I wouldn't mind if you ran it for Core too. :) > > Done, the next report will be based on data from FC[456]+updates and > FE[3456]. Could you add legacy bits, too, e.g. for FC3? > FC3 is not included because there's no SRPM repodata available for > its updates. Maybe the Legacy project has srpm repodata available and if not would probably be easy to set it up there. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgp0w33Iiru8Q.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
