Re: Broken upgrade paths in Fedora Extras 2006-06-16

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 12:13 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Paul Howarth (paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > buildsys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > >azureus:
> > >  5: 0:2.4.0.3-0.20060529cvs_1.fc5
> > >  6: 0:2.4.0.3-0.20060328cvs_5.fc6
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> > Perhaps the script could be enhanced to take into account packages that 
> > have migrated from Core to Extras and vice versa? I know that one of my 
> > packages has a broken upgrade path like this.
> > 
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191686
> 
> Heck, I wouldn't mind if you ran it for Core too. :)

Done, the next report will be based on data from FC[456]+updates and
FE[3456].  FC3 is not included because there's no SRPM repodata
available for its updates.

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux