On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 16:40 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 03:23:52PM +0200, Laurent Rineau wrote:
> > On Tuesday 27 June 2006 14:37, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 06:56 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > > > IMO, until an official policy is stated otherwise, in this case, I'd
> > > > say
> > > > don't worry too much about rpmlint's warning...
> > >
> > > I'd say take this as official. libexec is fine, and will continue to be
> > > used. We need to fix rpmlint to accept it.
> >
> > On x86_64, should /usr/libexec be 64bits or 32bits?
>
> Treat it like %{_bindir}
Yep. Since libexec is basically used for helper binaries that users
don't directly execute
Jeremy
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
