On Tuesday 20 June 2006 10:33, Rex Dieter wrote: > Jonathan Underwood wrote: > > OK - I'd missed that subtelty, sorry. I suppose that's the best (most > > consistent) situation that can be hoped for. > > Or, follow what koffice in Extras did, and use a meta-package named > koffice-suite. A nice advantage of this approach is that since the old > name is no longer being used, we have the opportunity to drop all those > darn Epoch's from kde packaging. And break with upstream package name, package name that the current users are already accustomed, and kdebase and kdelibs should not be sub-packaged, so they will still have these nasty Epochs. I see no advantages here. BTW, I had difficulties into installing koffice because of this reason: a simply yum install koffice didn't work. Then I installed one for one until I found out koffice-suite exists (dumb me!) :) > > -- Rex -- []'s Eitch http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/ "Talk is cheap. Show me the code." - Linus Torvalds -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
