Re: KDE Sub-Packaging Approach on Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hugo Cisneiros wrote:

Updates:
======= - Using -n in the subpackages %package could give us the "simple package name" instead of using "Provides:". Is it better? It will not polute the specfile? Opinion: Some think it's better. If it really is, task for Eitch: make changes into the kdegames example.

If you *are* to do this, I'd lean toward keeping the namespace clean an keep things like kdegames-foo1, kdegames-foo2 and then possibly use
Provides: foo1
and
Provides: foo2

- Bring this into FESCo attention?

IMO, no need for that (yet).

-- Rex

--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux