On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 09:10 -0400, buildsys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: [lots of broken upgrade paths] Sadly, it seems that this whine mail hasn't helped noticeably to kick folks to fix up their packages' upgrade paths, especially between FC-5 and devel. I've filed bugs about a bunch of others cases, and most of them have been fixed, but more breakage is introduced all the time. So, I'm inclined to omit devel from this report for now, and re-enable it closer to the FC6 release, hoping that doing so would trigger people to fix their stuff at least in released distro branches so they're easier to notice and won't be lost in the noise of current FC5->devel brokenness. Objections? Below is an edited version of the previous report; this is what it would have looked like if devel wasn't included. > dillo: > 3: 0:0.8.6-1.fc3 (FE3) > 4: 0:0.8.5-2.fc4 (FE4) > 5: 0:0.8.6-1.fc5 (FE5) > > fish: > 4: 0:1.14.0-1.fc4 (FE4) > 5: 0:1.12.0-1.fc5 (FE5) > > gdesklets: > 4: 0:0.35.3-8.1.fc4 (FE4) > 5: 0:0.35.3-8.fc5 (FE5) > > gnomad2: > 3: 0:2.8.6-2.fc3 (FE3) > 4: 0:2.8.6-1.fc4 (FE4) > 5: 0:2.8.5-1.fc5 (FE5) > > Hermes: > 4: 0:1.3.3-9.fc4 (FE4) > 5: 0:1.3.3-7 (FE5) > > hspell: > 4: 0:1.0-4.fc4 (FE4) > 5: 0:1.0-3.fc5 (FE5) > > m17n-db: > 4: 0:1.3.3-1.fc4 (FE4) > 5: 0:1.3.3-1 (FC5) > > mozilla: > 3: 37:1.7.13-1.3.1.legacy (FL3-updates) > 4: 37:1.7.13-1.1.fc4 (FC4-updates) > 5: 37:1.7.13-1.1.fc5 (FC5-updates) > > paraview: > 4: 0:2.4.3-7.fc4 (FE4) > 5: 0:2.4.3-6.fc5 (FE5) > > perl-String-CRC32: > 4: 0:1.4-1.fc4 (FE4) > 5: 0:1.4-1.FC5 (FC5-updates) > > tetex-eurofont: > 4: 0:1.1.3-5.fc4 (FE4) > 5: 0:1.1.3-2 (FE5) > > tetex-fonts-hebrew: > 4: 0:0.1-6.fc4 (FE4) > 5: 0:0.1-5.fc5 (FE5) > > wine-docs: > 3: 0:0.9.16-1.fc3 (FE3) > 4: 0:0.9.16-0.1.fc4 (FE4) > 5: 0:0.9.16-1.fc5 (FE5) -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
