On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 17:24 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Mike McGrath schrieb: > > Below are the election results for the recent FESCo Election. I'd > > encourage another person to verify these results. The cutoff line was 13. > > Votes | Human_name | Fedora_account_id > > thx for posting the results mmcgrath, thx to the infrastructure team in > general, thx to Toshio and everybody else for programing the voting app > and congrats to all those that got elected. > > But now to the real topic of this mail: What do all of you think about > the whole election. Was it a good idea? Yes. > Or only wasted time? "Total > Ballots: 69" (we have round about 270 people that were permitted to > vote) looks a bit sad IMHO. > No. It sets a precedent that representative governance is the way the Fedora Project is going to be run in the future. > Should we do another election in the future? yes. > When? Reelect half of the > seats after FC7 (FC6 is to short)? The other half after FC8, then the > first half again after FC9 (and so forth)? > Are there going to be other Steering Comittee/Board Elections? If the Fedora Advisory Board starts having elections as well, it might be nice to have less elections at the Steering Comittee level (in terms of voter burnout). > Anything else we should handle differently in the future? I think Contingent Candidates should be handled a bit different as the way we did it this time was a bit confusing. Perhaps encourage the candidates to throw their hat in the ring without contingencies. Perhaps if open seats < number of non-contingent candidates put the contingent candidates in the election and hold them to wherever they end up in the voting; otherwise take them off the ballot entirely. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
