-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Troels Arvin wrote: > Hello, > > At http://troels.arvin.dk/code/psycopg2/rpm/python-psycopg2.spec I've put > a spec-file for a "python-psycopg2" package. The spec-file is modified > from the spec-file in > http://fedoraproject.org/extras/development/SRPMS/python-psycopg-1.1.21-4.fc5.src.rpm > > An rpm from the spec-file has been tested on my x86_64 installation and > seems to work well. > > I considered adding a "Conflicts: python-psycopg", but it seems that there > is no conflict in having both python-psycopg and python-psycopg2. > The psycopg2 package doesn't conflict with psycopg as the names have changed. Additionally, psycopg2 provides a backwards compatibility module. I'm not sure how complete the back-compat is and am simply waiting for psycopg2 to get out of beta before packaging it. Due to the upstream name change, there are some minor administrative questions about packaging the new package as well as determining how to deal with backwards compatibility. It's on my list, just not terribly high priority until psycopg2 is out of beta. - -- Shahms E. King <shahms@xxxxxxxxxx> Multnomah ESD Public Key: http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/~sking/shahms.asc Fingerprint: 1612 054B CE92 8770 F1EA AB1B FEAB 3636 45B2 D75B -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEq8+n/qs2NkWy11sRAnmVAJ9C+DCgWvWauWHOW/pXEaradDzeGgCfYzg7 TMgtQ4y7eodOCXIp5BpoGoc= =h1sB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
