-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Shahms King wrote: > Troels Arvin wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> At http://troels.arvin.dk/code/psycopg2/rpm/python-psycopg2.spec I've put >>> a spec-file for a "python-psycopg2" package. The spec-file is modified >>> from the spec-file in >>> http://fedoraproject.org/extras/development/SRPMS/python-psycopg-1.1.21-4.fc5.src.rpm >>> >>> An rpm from the spec-file has been tested on my x86_64 installation and >>> seems to work well. >>> >>> I considered adding a "Conflicts: python-psycopg", but it seems that there >>> is no conflict in having both python-psycopg and python-psycopg2. >>> > > The psycopg2 package doesn't conflict with psycopg as the names have > changed. Additionally, psycopg2 provides a backwards compatibility > module. I'm not sure how complete the back-compat is and am simply > waiting for psycopg2 to get out of beta before packaging it. Due to the > upstream name change, there are some minor administrative questions > about packaging the new package as well as determining how to deal with > backwards compatibility. It's on my list, just not terribly high > priority until psycopg2 is out of beta. I spoke too soon. It appears as though psycopg2 is finally out of beta and I will get on packaging it ASAP. The administrative issues involving the upgrade path still remain, but I will resolve those and work on psycopg2 packages soon. - -- Shahms E. King <shahms@xxxxxxxxxx> Multnomah ESD Public Key: http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/~sking/shahms.asc Fingerprint: 1612 054B CE92 8770 F1EA AB1B FEAB 3636 45B2 D75B -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFErAKT/qs2NkWy11sRAvH+AKCYNvI8Ud6qNmugGxYJmSNCW+3UtACfcAUk LkjTm4rsovIquP6RU/keQlQ= =TZLk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
