On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 15:53 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > seth vidal schrieb: > >>> You also have the problem of folks being on holiday. It's not unusual in > >>> the UK for people to vanish for 2 - 3 weeks. > >> So what? While on vacation, one of your packages may need the attention. > >> It's best to have co-maintainers. > > +1 for co-maintainers. > > Well, should we try to enforce co-maintainers in the longer term? Enforce? ... encourage, yes. > E.g. a > rule "each package must have at least one primary maintainer and one > co-maintainer"? I am strongly opposed to this. It would be counterproductive. What we need is teams, dealing with certain tasks (e.g. systematic packaging bugs, x86_64 portability issues, security), not "multiple owners", fighting for details. Ralf -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
