seth vidal wrote:
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 15:53 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
seth vidal schrieb:
You also have the problem of folks being on holiday. It's not unusual in
the UK for people to vanish for 2 - 3 weeks.
So what? While on vacation, one of your packages may need the attention.
It's best to have co-maintainers.
+1 for co-maintainers.
Well, should we try to enforce co-maintainers in the longer term? E.g. a
rule "each package must have at least one primary maintainer and one
co-maintainer"?
That'll just make the barrier to addition higher.
I'd say we don't mandate it but make sure all the bits are there for it
to be encouraged :)
-sv
Why not just have a task force who's job it is to make sure that
critical updates get applied in a timely manner. If a bug is not
responded to in a certain amount of time then the task force imports and
builds the new package. 2-3 weeks is a long time for a security
vulnerability, but it doesn't seem that long to wait for a major/minor
release.
-Mike
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
