enforce co-maintainers (was: Re: next FESCo meeting agenda.)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



seth vidal schrieb:
>>> You also have the problem of folks being on holiday. It's not unusual in
>>> the UK for people to vanish for 2 - 3 weeks.
>> So what? While on vacation, one of your packages may need the attention.
>> It's best to have co-maintainers.
> +1 for co-maintainers.

Well, should we try to enforce co-maintainers in the longer term? E.g. a
rule "each package must have at least one primary maintainer and one
co-maintainer"?

Cu
thl

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux