Am Sonntag, den 09.07.2006, 13:41 -0500 schrieb Matt Domsch: > On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 06:31:51PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > Michael Schwendt schrieb: > > > On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 15:42:35 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > >> * FESCo > > >> * The old FESCo didn't work to well. A lot of members weren't very > > >> active. A lot of stuff was still discussed, but a lot of things didn't > > >> get done. Some things were discussed and agreed on, but not documented > > >> in the wiki. > > > There ought to be a web page with announcements. The history of decisions > > > made by FESCo. > > I think the FESCo meeting summaries should have a section annoucements. > > But I oppose a web page with a decision history. Decisions should be > > documented at a proper place where they belong (for exmplae the > > dead.package mechanism should be documented on the extras-cvs-faq page. > > Or in a maintainer guide). They need to be documented there in any case > > >> * Sponsors should be able to "subscribe" to the people they sponsored > > >> -- e.g. they should get additional mails when people they sponsored > > >> commit something to cvs, requested a build ... > > > Not necessary for commits. > > I'd like to have them for commits. > procmail. > # Filter for my own packages > :0 Hc > * ^X-BeenThere:.*fedora-extras-commits@xxxxxxxxxx > * ? formail -x"Subject:" | egrep -is -f $HOME/.procmail-fedora-extras-packages > $HOME/Mail/fe-mypackages Sure, that's a solution (at least for all those that use procmail). But I'd prefer a solution on the server side that gets maintained automatically because a local setup is much more likely to break (package renames, forgetting to add new packages,...). Also imagine people like spot -- he sponsored 31 people (don't know how many packages they own) and owns 94 packages. Do you want to main a $HOME/.procmail-fedora-extras-packages file for him? That's what computers are good for. Also: People tend to set up filters wrongly. During the "FAKE: Fedora Extras shipped popular package with rootkit and more than ten thousands systems were infected" discussion I chatted with a contributor privately. He told me that he won't miss commits from other people to his packages because be has a filter that (as he thought) copies all commits to his packages to a special folder. But after one or to minutes he said -- "OMG -- I set up the filter wrongly -- it only copies commits that are from me to that folders, so I won't miss all the commits from other people to my packages." > > > Full name and user name are in the "From" > > > line in the mail header and in the "Author:" field of the body. > > Username might change and thus break local filters. Local filter can be > > forgotten. Or set up wrongly. > > Also non-sponsors might be interested in this feature as well. > Sure, it can be over-engineered, but need it be? That's why the initial mail had "[...] should be realized soon and what can be worked on later (or ignored completely)." ;-) CU thl -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
