On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 06:31:51PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > > Michael Schwendt schrieb: > > On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 15:42:35 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > >> * FESCo > >> * The old FESCo didn't work to well. A lot of members weren't very > >> active. A lot of stuff was still discussed, but a lot of things didn't > >> get done. Some things were discussed and agreed on, but not documented > >> in the wiki. > > There ought to be a web page with announcements. The history of decisions > > made by FESCo. > > I think the FESCo meeting summaries should have a section annoucements. > > But I oppose a web page with a decision history. Decisions should be > documented at a proper place where they belong (for exmplae the > dead.package mechanism should be documented on the extras-cvs-faq page. > Or in a maintainer guide). They need to be documented there in any case > >> * Sponsors should be able to "subscribe" to the people they sponsored > >> -- e.g. they should get additional mails when people they sponsored > >> commit something to cvs, requested a build ... > > Not necessary for commits. > > I'd like to have them for commits. procmail. # Filter for my own packages :0 Hc * ^X-BeenThere:.*fedora-extras-commits@xxxxxxxxxx * ? formail -x"Subject:" | egrep -is -f $HOME/.procmail-fedora-extras-packages $HOME/Mail/fe-mypackages > > Full name and user name are in the "From" > > line in the mail header and in the "Author:" field of the body. > > Username might change and thus break local filters. Local filter can be > forgotten. Or set up wrongly. > > Also non-sponsors might be interested in this feature as well. Sure, it can be over-engineered, but need it be? -- Matt Domsch Software Architect Dell Linux Solutions linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux Linux on Dell mailing lists @ http://lists.us.dell.com -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
