On 09/07/06, Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
* Co-Maintainership * This is IMO one of the biggest areas we should work on soon * each package should IMHO have at least two maintainers (one of them should be the "primary maintainer", who has the last word if there are disagreements how to do things)
This keeps coming up, and everyone agrees that co-maintainence is a good idea whenever possible (i.e. where there are willing people). OTOH very few people agree that having only a single maintainer should be a blocker, but that's ok. However, the CC list remains broken and the status quo remains. Without wishing to criticise, I genuinely wonder what is blocking progress on this? What can we do to help? Jonathan. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
