Christian.Iseli@xxxxxxxx wrote:
rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx said:
If by "fail the build" you really mean "warn the packager", then we're in
agreement. (:
I'd like something a bit more intrusive than a warning. What I'd like to see
is:
...
5. at this point, maintainer has to scan the diffs and make a decision:
A. the diffs are inocuous -> update the reference files and resubmit the
build
Community will see the updates to the reference files and can comment where
needed...
I think this would be a pretty nice and easy QA improvement.
Ugh, one more thing for packagers to do (maintaining rpmlint and rpm
Provides/Requires reference files). I suppose if it could be made
dead-simple to maintaine/update, via something like,
make update-buildsys-reference-files
(or whatever), I wouldn't mind.
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
