Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 10:19 -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> [1] no support for "active" builders where the builder contacts the
> server, 

Correct

> no support for SSL connections between server<->builder (though
> I could be wrong here), and no support for SSL connections for the
> client (though I could also be wrong here)

brew uses kerberos instead of SSL; so same idea, different
implementation.  I don't think that kerberos would really work for the
needs of Extras, though

Jeremy

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux