On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 01:30:00PM +0200, Helge Hess wrote: > On Jul 11, 2006, at 11:15, Axel Thimm wrote: > >On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 02:02:55AM +0200, Helge Hess wrote: > >>Note: gnustep-make != gnustep-make. You need to consider the > >>configuration of gnustep-make. If its configured for the gnu-fd-nil > >>library combo (as currently required by OGo), it won't work with > >>GNUstep and the other way around. > >I though the parameter was the _default_ combo and could be overridden > >later on. Or does one need the "fat binaries"? > > Hm, yes, you are right. One can switch the library combo using a > script (probably not even necessary for compilation, just doing a > "make LIBRARY_COMBO=gnu-fd-nil" might do in this case). OK, then how about having gnustep-make default to gnu-gnu-gnu, e.g. be gnustepish and pass the gnu-fd-nil combo for the further builds? We also got rid of libobjc-fd2, so we can make everybody happy. > >>Wrt the issue report, I'm trying hard to push FHS into GNUstep for a > >>few years now. And while people do not seem to object anymore (no > >>religious discussions like before), the people who need to do the > >>required work (mostly Nicola Pero) are too busy to actually do it ;-/ > >Do you have fhs patches for gnustep-make? > > No. We hack that a layer above in the makefiles (fhs.make), which is > quite annoying but works. I'll keep things more gnustep-like then fixing only the most ugly fhs breaking bits. Let's hope gnustep developers fix FHS, soon. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpp1tF0X8T2D.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
