On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 12:53:03PM +0200, Erwin Rol wrote: > On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 12:23 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 01:04:05AM +0200, Helge Hess wrote: > > > On Jul 4, 2006, at 14:43, Axel Thimm wrote: > > > >That's how it is done now already. gnustep-make, libFoundation are > > > >non-issues. libobjc-lf2 is a hack, but in this light still packaged > > > >decently, but getting rid of it would be a blessing. > > > > > > We have released libFoundation 1.1.0 which removes the hack > > > > So gnustep-make can safely use -lobjc instead of -lobjc-lf2 as a > > default? > > > > > and adds a preliminary x86_64 port (seems to work fine but is not > > > well tested ...): > > > > > > http://svn.opengroupware.org/ThirdParty/releases/libFoundation-1.1.0/ > > > > > > We'll work on packaging it (including RPMs and tarballs) ASAP but > > > maybe you want to look into this as well for your Fedora package. > > > > I'd prefer using a released tarball otherwise it will make the review > > process much harder (the reviewer is supposed to check the sources). > > > > Even if it sounds silly, can you please just officially upload the > > tarball to a permanent URL? Thanks! > > So after this is done it means gnustep-make and libFoundation packages > can be added to FE ? Axel will you "arrange" that ? Already started earlier today, but I'm waiting till the end of week to make a call for reviewers (where Helge will have released some more bits :). See for example: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197649 I'll repost with a list of all opengroupware related bugzillas when they are submitted. > The next step would be sope, Helge is there any magic going on in sope, > or is that just a matter of packaging the latest release tarball. Like > Axel mentioned working from a non tarball makes things a bit hard (local > testing would work of course). It's just packaging it up and I hope the current specfile will still be able to do it. I recently packaged sope 4.5.7 and apart from an ICE in objc in fc4 it went fine. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpbKh2JUcDcS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
