Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hans de Goede schrieb:
> 
> Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Sun, 2006-07-09 at 18:31 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>> Michael Schwendt schrieb:
>>>> On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 15:42:35 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>>>>  * Co-Maintainership
>>>>>   * This is IMO one of the biggest areas we should work on soon
>>>> It is unimportant. 
>>> It is important to work on...
>>>> Co-maintenance is possible for a long time.
>>> ..because it's not used.
>> Not entirely the case.  There are those that co-maintain packages
>> already.  Ville and I do this for tla.  Admittedly, that is a fairly
>> low-maintenance package though.
> Simply not true is more like it. John Novy and I co maintain allegro,
> and Shitlesh and I ode and xxx and yyy, zzz. this is already done!!

Yeah, sorry, there should have been a "nearly" between "because" and
"it's not used..". But it still think it should be used a lot more.

CU
thl

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux