Hi, > > 4a. 1.2.4a is moved to legacy and the 1.x branch removed from FE CVS > > What do you mean with "branch removed from FE CVS"? Currently, when I do a cvs co for anjuta, directories for RH-9 to FC-devel are checked out. What I propose is that for anjuta-2.x is that only rawhide, the current version and one version back exists, the rest are shifted to legacy (which I don't have any real interest in supporting). Apologies if I've used the wrong terminology. > Note that a review is not required for Anjuta 2.x when it is an ordinary > version upgrade. It would be your personal decision to request reviews in > order to get feedback prior to upgrading the package in FE Development. Anjuta-2.x is almost (but not quite) a different beast to anjuta-1.x. While I'm aware that I just have to do a fresh import for the upgrade, I'd rather get the new package peer reviewed incase I've broken something while building etc. Anjuta-2.x is not a trivial package! TTFN Paul -- "99 Jahre Krieg ließen Keinen Platz für Sieger - Kriegesminister gibt's nicht mehr - und auch keine Düsenflieger - heute ziehe ich meine Runden - sehe die Welt in Trümmern liegen - hab' nen Luftballon gefunden - denk an dich und laß ihn fliegen" - Nena, 99 luft balons
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
