On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 07:30:21 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> > Hmm, I wonder how this can be checked easily by a reviewer. I
> > reviewed said package but had pretty much no chance of noticing this.
>
> Nothing trivial springs to mind... possibly a yum-util that checks a
> package's filelist against the contents of the filelists for repos. But
> that can only say that both contain the same filename -- it won't do
> anything to find out if they really conflict[1]
>
> Jeremy
>
> [1] Since identically md5sum'd files don't conflict
Yes, but no reason to worry. In case identical file names have been found
and provided that there are only a few packages which contain these files,
they can be downloaded and checked more thoroughly. A simple form to display
the checksums and more for easy parsing is:
rpm -qp --qf '[%-10{filemodes:perms} %{filemd5s} %{filenames}\n]' package.rpm
Some of rpm's query-tags can be used to give prettier output when listing
packages during package review, e.g.:
function rpmls {
rpm -q --qf '[%-10{filemodes:perms} %{filenames}\n]' $1 $2
}
function rpmlsv {
rpm -qlv $1 $2 | awk -F\ '{ print $1,substr($3,0,8),substr($3,9,8),$4,sprin
tf("%9d",$5),$9; }'
}
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
