On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 11:00 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Ralf Corsepius schrieb: > > On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 09:39 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > >> Not that it matters much, but: > >> > >> Paul Howarth schrieb: > >>> On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 18:57 +1200, Michael J. Knox wrote: > >>>> Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >>> In virtually all of these cases, the right thing to add as a buildreq is > >>> actually intltool really, since XML::Parser is being checked for in the > >>> configure script to ensure that intltool will work. > >> Yes. But intltool is included in some (a lot of?) packages so... > >>> Adding intltool as a > >>> buildreq will automatically pull in XML::Parser. > >> ...will add a package as buildreq that's not used at all during build. > > Maybe I should have mentioned here... > > "So adding > BuildRequires: perl(XML::Parser) > is IMHO the better solution" > > ...because I fail to understand what you want to tell me with: I and tell you: Adding BuildRequires: perl(XML::Parser) to packages using intltool is non-sense, because BuildRequires: intltool must already pull in perl(XML::Parser). If this doesn't work, intltool's packaging is broken. Ralf -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
