fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx said: > But now to the real topic of this mail: What do all of you think about the > whole election. Was it a good idea? Yes. > Or only wasted time? No. > "Total Ballots: 69" > (we have round about 270 people that were permitted to vote) looks a bit sad > IMHO. So ? If the remaining 201 people don't have an opinion, that's their right. Maybe they'll form an opinion over time, and participate in the next election. > Should we do another election in the future? Yes. > When? Reelect half of the seats > after FC7 (FC6 is to short)? The other half after FC8, then the first half > again after FC9 (and so forth)? Yes, I think that was the idea. > Anything else we should handle differently in the future? I see Seth, Ville, and Michael got re-elected even though it said on the nomination page: nominated for the new FESCo as contingent by skvidal (contingent: if no one else wants it - they will step up and do the job) I know I abstained voting for them because of this message... I do hope they'll accept the job now. Maybe next time it'd be better if the nomination page is a bit clearer and doesn't mislead me into thinking some of the people there might prefer not being elected. Cheers, Christian -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
