On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 15:12 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > My apologies; I'm resending this because I mistyped the address of the > SExtractor maintainer. > > >>>>> "RC" == Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > RC> On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 10:24 -0700, Sergio Pascual wrote: > >> %build -%configure +%configure CFLAGS="${CFLAGS} -funroll-loops > >> -fomit-frame-pointer -O1 > RC> REVERT this change IMMEDIATELY. > > RC> You are breaking debug infos. > > Yes, this is not good. During a review, this would be a BLOCKER and would cause a package not to be accepted. I am not willing to let maintainers get away with such stuff post-review. > For reference, the bug which prompted this is > here: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199700 > > The problem is that the code simply does not function with the default > Fedora optimization flags. I am not familiar with the software and > have no idea whether this points to a GCC problem or just poorly > written code. Someone should investigate the minimum change to the > stock Fedora cflags which permit this software to work properly, and > then investigate why the behavior differs. > > Is there a standard method for overriding a single flag in > %{optflags}? The way he does it is the way how things are supposed to work. The problem is what he does: -fomit-frame-pointer Ralf -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list