Rahul schrieb: > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> Rahul schrieb: >>> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >>>> * we need a defined and documented policy to get definite answers for >>>> open legal question >>> Kindly contact the Fedora advisory board where our counsel is a >>> member. Call this policy. >>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board >> We need to discuss things first. Warren seems to be the one to contact >> when there are issues. But that's nowhere documented (and might be wrong) > > Its already documented who the legal contact is clearly > http://fedora.redhat.com/About/contact.html > If you think that isnt working, the advisory board list is a open path. > What exactly is the concern here? We are far away from the point where FAB need to be bought into the discussion. We simply need a documented way that lays down thinks like "If you have a software and are not sure if it can be packaged for Extras ask foo@xxxxxxx for advice. He will forward it to FESCo and/or Fedora Legal if it becomes necessary and help you getting the problem resolved." CU thl -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
