Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2006-07-09 at 15:42 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>  * Co-Maintainership
> 
>   * This is IMO one of the biggest areas we should work on soon
> 
>   * each package should IMHO have at least two maintainers (one of them
> should be the "primary maintainer", who has the last word if there are
> disagreements how to do things)

This seems like a good purpose for SIGs. The SIG can act as a collective
maintainer/co-maintainer for packages in their areas of interest.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux