On 7/10/06, Christopher Stone <chris.stone@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 7/10/06, Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 21:50 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > As a first step, every packager (and package submitter) ought to use > > rpmlint manually more often and run it also on the binary rpms. > > And preferably also on _installed_ packages. Is there a way to do this without checking all installed packages?
nevermind, I was confused by the fact that the command "rpmlint asdfasdfasdfasdf" gave the same results as rpmlint poker-eval (one of my packages). I just assumed that rpmlint didnt do anything in this case, even using -v did not give any error message when I gave it a bogus package name. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
