On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 14:55 -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
> I'm currently working on getting Paste{,Deploy,Script} though the review
> process, and Patrice Dumas asks a good naming question in the bug[0]:
>
> I don't know if the name should be python-paste-deploy or
> python-pastedeploy. The guidelines don't cover the case of python
> submodules. If it is "This makes a package name format of python-$NAME"
> it seems to be python-pastedeploy, but if one follow "use the name of the
> module that you type to import it in a script" it should be
> python-paste-deploy. The second naming convention is also consistent
> with perl modules naming.
>
I'd follow the second line of reasoning: If it's "import paste.deploy"
name it "python-paste-deploy". I don't recall this ever being discussed
before, though.
>
> [0]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198288#c2
-Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
