On Saturday 15 July 2006 20:19, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 2006-07-15 at 19:25 -0500, Patrick W. Barnes wrote: > > You also need to clearly understand the CLA and its purpose. Rather than > > attempt to summarize anything, I'll recommend that you look over the > > Legal section of the wiki carefully. You should know that signing the > > CLA and submitting it to the wiki licenses it under the terms of the OPL > > without options. It also grants an irrevocable copyright license to the > > Fedora > > It says "Texts contributed after 2006-02-19 or by members of the > EditGroup are the licensed under the terms of the Open Publication > License v1.0 without options, unless otherwise noted." And it does not > say _who_ can otherwise note. While I don't personally agree with this > specific instance, I also don't see where licensing a page under a > different license is not allowed. The wording is a bit ambiguous. > The "unless otherwise noted" is intended to allow the Board, assorted committees, etc. to handle special cases where the OPL cannot apply, such as pages where the ACLs have been loosened to allow anyone to contribute without granting a copyright license. It is not a manner for contributors to circumvent our licensing requirements. The Fedora Project holds a copyright license for anything that is submitted by a contributor with a signed CLA. Using the power of that copyright license, the Fedora Project applies the OPL without options to documentation and website contributions. That right is not revocable. -- Patrick "The N-Man" Barnes nman64@xxxxxxxxx http://www.n-man.com/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/nman64 Have I been helpful? Rate my assistance! http://rate.affero.net/nman64/ --
Attachment:
pgpGtgQ4BR6K6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
