-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >>>>>>"w" == wart <wart@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > w> Is it allowed to use 0.n release tags during a package review, only > w> to change it to '1' once the package has been approved and > w> imported? > > It is commonly done by a couple of people. It violates the naming > guidelines, and if I didn't trust the packager I would want to see a > package that meets the naming guidelines before approving. > > I wouldn't really recommend it. Is there some reason why the package > imported into extras has to start with release 1? No particular reason, other than I have a handful of packages ready for review that are already using 0.n. It might make it a little easier to distinguish changes made during the review from change made after the review in the changelog entries, but that's not very important. - --Mike -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEtsh/DeYlPfs40g8RAhKFAJ9WnM6jwNg4nTY5pJS1QbUHrVLRAQCcCzJV prSADgz8fAN+aMP2voBNisY= =lNKE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
