>>>>> "w" == wart <wart@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: w> Is it allowed to use 0.n release tags during a package review, only w> to change it to '1' once the package has been approved and w> imported? It is commonly done by a couple of people. It violates the naming guidelines, and if I didn't trust the packager I would want to see a package that meets the naming guidelines before approving. I wouldn't really recommend it. Is there some reason why the package imported into extras has to start with release 1? - J< -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
