On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 23:58 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 21:50 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > As a first step, every packager (and package submitter) ought to use > > rpmlint manually more often and run it also on the binary rpms. > > And preferably also on _installed_ packages. > > Currently IIRC the only difference in rpmlint between checking > uninstalled and installed binary rpms is that the latter fakes some > checks to always succeed that make no sense for installed packages, and > additionally checks for undefined non-weak symbols in shared libs. But > it's likely that other useful checks that make sense for installed > packages only will be introduced in the future. Unowned directory checks for instance? Paul. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
