Re: next FESCo meeting agenda.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 19:27 +1200, Michael J. Knox wrote:
> Can this proposed policy be discussed in the next FESCo meeting?
> 
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MikeKnox/AWOL_Policy
> 
> There has been no (apparent) opposition to the policy.

The only thing that looks slightly amiss is this

"- If you are a not an existing Extras contributor, you can still take
over a package. All of the above must be followed. When you seek
approval for the take over, you, again, must provide a bugzilla report
as if it were a new Extras package review. This will allow the normal
review process to happen. Being how the package is in Extras already,
this process should be swift."

If you are not a contributor, you won't have CVS access and so will need
to go through the sign up, get a sponsor etc procedure. I personally
would not like to see that circumvented as it adds in that extra layer
of security.

I could have misread the above para, but I'm not sure I have.

The rest of it looks good :-)

TTFN

Paul
-- 
"99 Jahre Krieg ließen Keinen Platz für Sieger - Kriegesminister gibt's
nicht mehr - und auch keine Düsenflieger - heute ziehe ich meine Runden
- sehe die Welt in Trümmern liegen - hab' nen Luftballon gefunden - denk
an dich und laß ihn fliegen" - Nena, 99 luft balons

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux