Re: FE-NEW assigned and unassigned (Was Eiciel )

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Andy Burns schrieb:
> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> 
>> Agreed -- that's a common problem AFAICS (some bugs were for example
>> accidentally assigned to the default and mostly ignored
>> bugzilla-sink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx account).
> 
> Oh, having just looked at the activity and re-assigned the owner to it's
> original, but you're saying that "sink" was never the correct owner anyway?

It's the correct "owner" when the bugzilla-state/the bug is "new", but
no bugs ever should be assigned to it normally. If they are please treat
them as if they were "new".

Cu
thl

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux