On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 23:10 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 22:33 -0700, Chris Petersen wrote: > > >> A few of us, warren, mmcgrath, and I are designing a new system of > > >> version control for the packages in Core and Extras. The main page of > > >> requirements and some pros and cons of various VCS's are listed on: > > >> http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/VersionControl/ > > >> > > > > "con" for subversion is listed that auth must be through DAV, but a > > "pro" for mercurial is that it can do ssh. Just an fyi, but subversion > > works GREAT over ssh (via the svn+ssh:// uri), and projects like mythtv > > use this to separate anon checkout (http) with developer access (ssh). > > > > Granted, you're still limited to "full repository" access or no access > > with ssh since svn handles everything in its own database format. > > Yeah, that's pretty much a blocker for using svn+ssh. Why not use HTTPS and WebDAV for secure access to a SVN repository? SSL client certificates are already being generated/maintained for plague client access, why not use those certs for accessing the SVN repository? Jeff
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
