Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Request: Inclusion of a ruby template file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180066 ville.skytta@xxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo? ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta@xxxxxx 2006-07-06 17:51 EST ------- There's a spurious "BuildArchitectures: noarch" line in the new template, I suppose there are no objections to removing that. A BuildArch: placeholder is already there. I see ruby_sitelib and ruby_sitearch have had "dir" appended to them. While cosmetic, I think it would be good to be consistent with the perl and python precedents in templates and/or macros shipping in the main rpm package; both of perl and python use *_sitelib and *_sitearch without the trailing "dir". I've committed to rpmdevtools CVS with those changes, let me know if there are strong opinions on the *_site*dir macro names and/or if they're "set in stone" and I'll add those changes too. http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/fedora-rpmdevtools/spectemplate-ruby.spec?root=fedora&rev=.&view=markup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
