Re: Recapitulate the current state of Fedora Extras and some ideas to make it better

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 03:42:35PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>   * can we stick to the "rolling release" scheme when anaconda will
> start supporting external repos during install (the rolling release
> scheme might break installs (not sure, but I think that is possible))?
> And/or do we need Releases of Fedora Extras? E.g. ISOs of FE6 and a
> stable repo on the servers and all new version go to a "updates"
> directory (similar to core)?

I think moving to proper releases (and an updates area) is vital to making
Extras a true equal to core.

-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx          <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>              <http://linux.bu.edu/>

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux