On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 22:21 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 06:14:35PM -0700, Christopher Stone wrote: > > >Also I question the "Vote for no more than 13" limit. Approval voting > > >systems don't usually place a limit. > > +1 > > I think a lot of people felt they had to vote for 13 members and voted > > for people they were unsure about just to fill the 13 number. By not > > having any limit it is clear to voters that they can vote on as many > > or as few people as they like. Voting for every member would be the > > same as not voting at all. > > If we're going to get all fancy, I'd kind of like to see a "Yes/No/No > Opinion" choice. As it is, it's not clear from the lack of a checkmark if I > don't care or if I TOTALLY HATE THEM because they don't put version numbers > in their changelogs. * > > > > * :) you're just lucky I decided to step aside from my duly elected position - otherwise there'd be a new MUST in the guidelines something like: MUST sign up mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx for a new spam list before package can be approved. -sv -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
