Fedora Development Discussion

• Thread Index

• [Test-Announce] Fedora 33 Rawhide 20200510.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing
  • From: rawhide
• Re: Announce soname bump of zipper library
  • From: Igor Raits
• Re: Announce soname bump of zipper library
  • From: Antonio Trande
• Re: Announce soname bump of zipper library
  • From: Igor Raits
• Announce soname bump of zipper library
  • From: Antonio Trande
• Fedora-Cloud-31-20200510.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot via devel
• Fedora-Cloud-32-20200510.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: RFE: fed-needs-rebuilding
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Non-responsive maintainer: pcpa
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Fedora-IoT-33-20200509.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)
  • From: John M. Harris Jr
• Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200509.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Fedora 31->32 dnf system-update experience
  • From: John M. Harris Jr
• Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)
  • From: John M. Harris Jr
• Re: Block discard on more things
  • From: John M. Harris Jr
• Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Node.js 14.x by default
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• RFE: fed-needs-rebuilding
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Fedora-Cloud-31-20200509.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora-Cloud-30-20200509.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Unannounced SONAME bump: cgnslib (libcgns.4.0 → libcgns.4.1)
  • From: Igor Raits
• [Test-Announce] 2020-05-11 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200508.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: Unannounced SONAME bump: cgnslib (libcgns.4.0 → libcgns.4.1)
  • From: Sandro Mani
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Node.js 14.x by default
  • From: Tom Hughes via devel
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: Firewalld/nftable/libvirt...
  • From: Nathanael D. Noblet
• Re: Call for help: maven-verifier-plugin FTBFS with Java11
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Call for help: maven-verifier-plugin FTBFS with Java11
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Node.js 14.x by default
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Node.js 14.x by default
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: clime
• Re: Firewalld/nftable/libvirt...
  • From: Igor Raits
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Fedora-IoT-33-20200508.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Firewalld/nftable/libvirt...
  • From: Nathanael D. Noblet
• Re: Fedora 31->32 dnf system-update experience
  • From: Samuel Sieb
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: Licence confirmation for tpcclib
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: Licence confirmation for tpcclib
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Licence confirmation for tpcclib
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: Licence confirmation for tpcclib
  • From: J. Randall Owens
• Re: Fedora 31->32 dnf system-update experience
  • From: Dan Book
• Re: Fedora 31->32 dnf system-update experience
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Fedora 31->32 dnf system-update experience
  • From: Dan Book
• Re: sorting of git N-V-R tags in rpm package repositories
  • From: clime
• Re: Licence confirmation for tpcclib
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: Fedora 31->32 dnf system-update experience
  • From: Scott Talbert
• Re: Fedora 31->32 dnf system-update experience
  • From: Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
• Re: Fedora 31->32 dnf system-update experience
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Fedora 31->32 dnf system-update experience
  • From: Michael Catanzaro
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Ken Dreyer
• Re: Fedora 31->32 dnf system-update experience
  • From: Scott Talbert
• Re: Fedora 31->32 dnf system-update experience
  • From: Michael Catanzaro
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Fedora 31->32 dnf system-update experience
  • From: Scott Talbert
• Re: Self Introduction: Hunor Csomortáni
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Fedora 31->32 dnf system-update experience
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: clime
• Fedora 31->32 dnf system-update experience
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: clime
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: clime
• Unannounced SONAME bump: cgnslib (libcgns.4.0 → libcgns.4.1)
  • From: Igor Raits
• Schedule for Mondays's FESCo Meeting (2020-05-11)
  • From: Igor Raits
• Re: QtCreator armv7hl build failure, gcc bug?
  • From: Jakub Jelinek
• QtCreator armv7hl build failure, gcc bug?
  • From: Sandro Mani
• Re: Self Introduction: Purusharth Saxena (FAS: purusharths)
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Fedora-Cloud-32-20200508.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora-Cloud-30-20200508.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Can we distribute modular .repo files in a separate package?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Licence confirmation for tpcclib
  • From: Purusharth Saxena
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200507.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: clime
• Fedora-IoT-33-20200507.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Can we distribute modular .repo files in a separate package?
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Proposal: Add "Feedback" section to change proposal template
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: sorting of git N-V-R tags in rpm package repositories
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Ignoring non-Fedora notifications?
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Review swaps
  • From: Juan Orti Alcaine
• Re: Can we distribute modular .repo files in a separate package?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Call for help: maven-verifier-plugin FTBFS with Java11
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Call for help: maven-verifier-plugin FTBFS with Java11
  • From: Jerry James
• [Test-Announce] Fedora 33 Rawhide 20200507.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing
  • From: rawhide
• Re: Call for help: maven-verifier-plugin FTBFS with Java11
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: Call for help: maven-verifier-plugin FTBFS with Java11
  • From: Jerry James
• Call for help: maven-verifier-plugin FTBFS with Java11
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: Review swaps
  • From: Ian McInerney
• The future of Fedora community apps
  • From: Marie Nordin
• Review swaps
  • From: Juan Orti Alcaine
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Robbie Harwood
• Re: Can we distribute modular .repo files in a separate package?
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Hunor Csomortáni
• Re: Self Introduction: Hunor Csomortáni
  • From: David Kirwan
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• CPE PO Office Hours Reminder - 1400 UTC Today om #fedora-meeting-1
  • From: Aoife Moloney
• Fedora-Cloud-31-20200507.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: clime
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Self Introduction: Hunor Csomortáni
  • From: Hunor Csomortáni
• Re: Review swap: psi-notify
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Fedora-Cloud-32-20200507.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Fedora-Cloud-30-20200507.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Unannounced SONAME bump: libglade-2.so.6() (glade)
  • From: Igor Gnatenko
• Re: Unannounced SONAME bump: libglade-2.so.6() (glade)
  • From: Kalev Lember
• PWG meetup May - the latest printing/scanning stack updates
  • From: Zdenek Dohnal
• Unannounced SONAME bump: libglade-2.so.6() (glade)
  • From: Igor Gnatenko
• Review swap: psi-notify
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• Self Introduction: Purusharth Saxena (FAS: purusharths)
  • From: Purusharth Saxena
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Simo Sorce
• Re: Review swaps
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: clime
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: clime
• Non-responsive maintainer: jfch2222
  • From: Christian Kellner
• Re: Can we distribute modular .repo files in a separate package?
  • From: Leigh Scott
• Re: Proposal: Add "Feedback" section to change proposal template
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Review swaps
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: Proposal: Add "Feedback" section to change proposal template
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Can we distribute modular .repo files in a separate package?
  • From: Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Proposal: Add "Feedback" section to change proposal template
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: Can we distribute modular .repo files in a separate package?
  • From: Christopher
• Re: Proposal: Add "Feedback" section to change proposal template
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Robbie Harwood
• Re: Can we distribute modular .repo files in a separate package?
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Can we distribute modular .repo files in a separate package?
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Can we distribute modular .repo files in a separate package?
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Can we distribute modular .repo files in a separate package?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Fedora-Cloud-31-20200506.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Fedora-Cloud-32-20200506.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: sorting of git N-V-R tags in rpm package repositories
  • From: clime
• Re: sorting of git N-V-R tags in rpm package repositories
  • From: clime
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Tomas Tomecek
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Tomas Tomecek
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot via devel
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Tomas Tomecek
• Re: sorting of git N-V-R tags in rpm package repositories
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Proposal: Add "Feedback" section to change proposal template
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: [External] Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Cătălin George Feștilă
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Fedora-Cloud-30-20200506.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: sorting of git N-V-R tags in rpm package repositories
  • From: clime
• Re: New rpmbuild failure - new rpm? Other?
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: [External] Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Carlos Mogas da Silva via devel
• Re: [External] Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Jared Dominguez
• Re: [External] Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• RE: [External] Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Mark Pearson
• Re: OCaml packages in Rawhide are broken for long time
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Review swaps
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-26
  • From: Iñaki Ucar
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: [External] Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Proposal: Add "Feedback" section to change proposal template
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Proposal: Add "Feedback" section to change proposal template
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Robbie Harwood
• Re: games group in comps
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: games group in comps
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-26
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-26
  • From: Leigh Griffin
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Justin Forbes
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Ondřej Lysoněk
• Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-26
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: F32 s390x: ICE: attempting to access a gcc command line option that is not stored in global_options
  • From: Kalev Lember
• Re: When did journalctl change to volatile without my knowledge?
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: sorting of git N-V-R tags in rpm package repositories
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200505.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: <sys/sysctl.h> will disappear from rawhide glibc soon
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Tomas Tomecek
• Stewardship SIG Orphaned Nine Java Packages
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: <sys/sysctl.h> will disappear from rawhide glibc soon
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: F32 s390x: ICE: attempting to access a gcc command line option that is not stored in global_options
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Tomas Tomecek
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Tomas Tomecek
• Re: <sys/sysctl.h> will disappear from rawhide glibc soon
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Tomas Tomecek
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Tomas Tomecek
• F32 s390x: ICE: attempting to access a gcc command line option that is not stored in global_options
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: sorting of git N-V-R tags in rpm package repositories
  • From: clime
• Fedora-IoT-33-20200505.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Simo Sorce
• FESCo election nominations are now open
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-26
  • From: Leigh Griffin
• Re: When did journalctl change to volatile without my knowledge?
  • From: Michael Catanzaro
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Ondřej Lysoněk
• Re: OCaml packages in Rawhide are broken for long time
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Colin Walters
• Re: OCaml packages in Rawhide are broken for long time
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: OCaml packages in Rawhide are broken for long time
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: clime
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Tomas Tomecek
• Fedora-Cloud-31-20200505.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: New rpmbuild failure - new rpm? Other?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Tomas Tomecek
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Aarch64 build failure: hidden symbol `__aarch64_ldadd4_acq_rel' in /usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-redhat-linux/10/libgcc.a(ldadd_4_4.o) is referenced by DSO
  • From: Jakub Jelinek
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Tomas Tomecek
• Re: Aarch64 build failure: hidden symbol `__aarch64_ldadd4_acq_rel' in /usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-redhat-linux/10/libgcc.a(ldadd_4_4.o) is referenced by DSO
  • From: Peter Robinson
• Re: Aarch64 build failure: hidden symbol `__aarch64_ldadd4_acq_rel' in /usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-redhat-linux/10/libgcc.a(ldadd_4_4.o) is referenced by DSO
  • From: Stephan Bergmann
• Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-26
  • From: Guido Aulisi
• sorting of git N-V-R tags in rpm package repositories
  • From: clime
• Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Fedora-Cloud-32-20200505.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Fedora 33 Self-Contained Change proposal: Network Time Security
  • From: Miroslav Lichvar
• Re: Announcing bugzilla overrides coming to dist-git (stg)
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Announcing bugzilla overrides coming to dist-git (stg)
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Fedora-Cloud-30-20200505.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Announcing bugzilla overrides coming to dist-git (stg)
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: New rpmbuild failure - new rpm? Other?
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: OCaml packages in Rawhide are broken for long time
  • From: Igor Gnatenko
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200504.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: Aarch64 build failure: hidden symbol `__aarch64_ldadd4_acq_rel' in /usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-redhat-linux/10/libgcc.a(ldadd_4_4.o) is referenced by DSO
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: When did journalctl change to volatile without my knowledge?
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: When did journalctl change to volatile without my knowledge?
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: When did journalctl change to volatile without my knowledge?
  • From: Chris Murphy
• When did journalctl change to volatile without my knowledge?
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
  • From: James Cassell
• Re: New rpmbuild failure - new rpm? Other?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Review request
  • From: Bob Hepple
• FedoraRespin-32-updates-20200504.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• New rpmbuild failure - new rpm? Other?
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Fedora-IoT-33-20200504.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• [Test-Announce] Call For Test Days for Fedora 33!
  • From: Sumantro Mukherjee
• Fedora-Cloud-31-20200503.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora-Cloud-30-20200504.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora-Cloud-32-20200504.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora-Cloud-32-20200503.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Announcing bugzilla overrides coming to dist-git (stg)
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: New set of questions for FESCo candidates?
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: Announcing bugzilla overrides coming to dist-git (stg)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Announcing bugzilla overrides coming to dist-git (stg)
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Announcing bugzilla overrides coming to dist-git (stg)
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot via devel
• Fedora-Cloud-31-20200504.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Fedora 33 Self-Contained Change proposal: Network Time Security
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: José Abílio Matos
• Re: New set of questions for FESCo candidates?
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2020-05-04)
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: error in spec file
  • From: Globe Trotter via devel
• Re: Announcing bugzilla overrides coming to dist-git (stg)
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Tomas Tomecek
• Re: OCaml packages in Rawhide are broken for long time
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: OCaml packages in Rawhide are broken for long time
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: error in spec file
  • From: Dinesh Prasanth Moluguwan Krishnamoorthy
• Orphaned maven-release
  • From: Markku Korkeala
• Re: F33 system wide change, java-11-openjdk as system jdk
  • From: Jiri Vanek
• Re: Backports of fixes from F32 -> F31?
  • From: Alex Scheel
• Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Node.js 14.x by default
  • From: James Cassell
• Re: F33 system wide change, java-11-openjdk as system jdk
  • From: Iñaki Ucar
• Re: Aarch64 build failure: hidden symbol `__aarch64_ldadd4_acq_rel' in /usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-redhat-linux/10/libgcc.a(ldadd_4_4.o) is referenced by DSO
  • From: Jakub Jelinek
• Re: Aarch64 build failure: hidden symbol `__aarch64_ldadd4_acq_rel' in /usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-redhat-linux/10/libgcc.a(ldadd_4_4.o) is referenced by DSO
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Node.js 14.x by default
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Aarch64 build failure: hidden symbol `__aarch64_ldadd4_acq_rel' in /usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-redhat-linux/10/libgcc.a(ldadd_4_4.o) is referenced by DSO
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: F33 system wide change, java-11-openjdk as system jdk
  • From: Jiri Vanek
• Re: Grub, EFI, and SELinux
  • From: Javier Martinez Canillas
• Re: F33 system wide change, java-11-openjdk as system jdk
  • From: Iñaki Ucar
• Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Node.js 14.x by default
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: F33 system wide change, java-11-openjdk as system jdk
  • From: Jiri Vanek
• Re: Grub, EFI, and SELinux
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: Review request
  • From: Vascom
• Re: Intent to retire jamin
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: sorting of git N-V-R tags in rpm package repositories
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Review request
  • From: Bob Hepple
• CPE WEeekly: 2020-05-02
  • From: clime
• Re: Grub, EFI, and SELinux
  • From: Javier Martinez Canillas
• Ignoring non-Fedora notifications?
  • From: Elliott Sales de Andrade
• Re: CPE WEeekly: 2020-05-02
  • From: Clement Verna
• nettle 3.6 soname bump
  • From: Daiki Ueno
• Re: Aarch64 build failure: hidden symbol `__aarch64_ldadd4_acq_rel' in /usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-redhat-linux/10/libgcc.a(ldadd_4_4.o) is referenced by DSO
  • From: Milan Crha
• Re: CPE WEeekly: 2020-05-02
  • From: James Cassell
• Re: [External] Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Todd Zullinger
• sorting of git N-V-R tags in rpm package repositories
  • From: clime
• Re: python-pep8 is orphaned
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• Re: CPE WEeekly: 2020-05-02
  • From: clime
• CPE WEeekly: 2020-05-02
  • From: Aoife Moloney
• Re: Fedora 32 FTBFS packages to be orphaned in 1 week
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Intent to retire jamin
  • From: Guido Aulisi
• [epel7] python-flake8 - Re: python-pep8 is orphaned
  • From: Raphael Groner
• Re: python-pep8 is orphaned
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: python-pep8 is orphaned
  • From: Raphael Groner
• Re: python-pep8 is orphaned
  • From: Raphael Groner
• OCaml packages in Rawhide are broken for long time
  • From: Igor Gnatenko
• error in spec file
  • From: Globe Trotter via devel
• Re: Grub, EFI, and SELinux
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Node.js 14.x by default
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: orphaning bleachbit
  • From: Eduardo Javier Echeverria Alvarado
• Re: games group in comps
  • From: Artem Tim
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200502.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: Aarch64 build failure: hidden symbol `__aarch64_ldadd4_acq_rel' in /usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-redhat-linux/10/libgcc.a(ldadd_4_4.o) is referenced by DSO
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• games group in comps
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Aarch64 build failure: hidden symbol `__aarch64_ldadd4_acq_rel' in /usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-redhat-linux/10/libgcc.a(ldadd_4_4.o) is referenced by DSO
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: orphaning bleachbit
  • From: Silvia Sánchez
• [Test-Announce] Fedora 33 Rawhide 20200502.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing
  • From: rawhide
• Re: Aarch64 build failure: hidden symbol `__aarch64_ldadd4_acq_rel' in /usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-redhat-linux/10/libgcc.a(ldadd_4_4.o) is referenced by DSO
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Aarch64 build failure: hidden symbol `__aarch64_ldadd4_acq_rel' in /usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-redhat-linux/10/libgcc.a(ldadd_4_4.o) is referenced by DSO
  • From: Jakub Jelinek
• Fedora-Cloud-32-20200502.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Hundreds of aarch64 failures with gcc 10.0.1-0.13
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Aarch64 build failure: hidden symbol `__aarch64_ldadd4_acq_rel' in /usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-redhat-linux/10/libgcc.a(ldadd_4_4.o) is referenced by DSO
  • From: Sandro Mani
• Re: Grub, EFI, and SELinux
  • From: Christopher
• Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2020-05-04)
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: orphaning bleachbit
  • From: Silvia Sánchez
• Fedora-Cloud-31-20200502.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Hundreds of aarch64 failures with gcc 10.0.1-0.13
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: F33 system wide change, java-11-openjdk as system jdk
  • From: judovana
• Fedora-Cloud-30-20200502.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Node.js 14.x by default
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• [Test-Announce] 2020-05-04 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: orphaning bleachbit
  • From: Alessio
• Re: OCaml 4.11 prerelease in Rawhide (was: Re: ocaml-bisect-ppx and related updates)
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Node.js 14.x by default
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: F33 system wide change, java-11-openjdk as system jdk
  • From: Alex Scheel
• Re: F33 system wide change, java-11-openjdk as system jdk
  • From: judovana
• Re: F33 system wide change, java-11-openjdk as system jdk
  • From: judovana
• Re: F33 system wide change, java-11-openjdk as system jdk
  • From: judovana
• Re: [External] Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: James Szinger
• Re: F33 system wide change, java-11-openjdk as system jdk
  • From: Alex Scheel
• Re: [External] Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: [External] Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: [External] Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: James Szinger
• Re: Grub, EFI, and SELinux
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: [External] Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
• Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: James Cassell
• Re: F33 system wide change, java-11-openjdk as system jdk
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Grub, EFI, and SELinux
  • From: Christopher
• Re: Co-Maintainers wanted for python-lockfile EPEL branches
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for hubbitus
  • From: Pavel Alexeev
• Re: [External] Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Alexander Ploumistos
• Re: [External] Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Jared Dominguez
• RE: [External] Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Mark Pearson
• RE: [External] Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Mark Pearson
• Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Alexander Ploumistos
• Re: simple-koji-ci fails with new patch
  • From: Iñaki Ucar
• Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: James Cassell
• Re: WARNING: The pip package is not available, falling back to EasyInstall
  • From: Luke Hinds
• Re: [External] Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: James Cassell
• Fedora-Cloud-31-20200501.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Alexander Ploumistos
• Fedora-IoT-33-20200501.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: simple-koji-ci fails with new patch
  • From: Dan Horák
• Re: [External] Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Solomon Peachy
• simple-koji-ci fails with new patch
  • From: Iñaki Ucar
• RE: [External] Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Mark Pearson
• RE: [External] Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Markus Larsson
• RE: [External] Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Mark Pearson
• Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
• RE: [External] Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Mark Pearson
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200430.n.1 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Peter Robinson
• Re: [External] Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Richard Hughes
• Re: [External] Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Tomasz Torcz
• Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
• Fedora-Cloud-32-20200501.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora-Cloud-30-20200501.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Markus Larsson
• Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
  • From: Markku Korkeala
• Re: [External] Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Joe Doss
• Re: python2-dns without DNSSEC support in rawhide
  • From: Lumir Balhar
• RE: [External] Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Mark Pearson
• RE: [External] Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Mark Pearson
• RE: [External] Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Mark Pearson
• Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Garry T. Williams
• Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Solomon Peachy
• Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Zachary Snyder
• Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Björn 'besser82' Esser
• Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Tomasz Torcz
• Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Mark Pearson
• REMINDER: Fedora 30 EOL on 2020-05-26
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: Proposal to enable spec file preprocessing step before srpm build
  • From: clime
• Re: Flock to Fedora --> Nest with Fedora!
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• Flock to Fedora --> Nest with Fedora!
  • From: Marie Nordin
• Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)
  • From: clime
• Re: Proposal to enable spec file preprocessing step before srpm build
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot via devel
• Re: [Test-Announce] Taskotron is EOL today
  • From: clime
• Re: Co-Maintainers wanted for python-lockfile EPEL branches
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Untouched BZ against cinnamon-desktop
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• F33 system wide change, java-11-openjdk as system jdk
  • From: Jiri Vanek
• F33 system wide change, java-11-openjdk as system jdk
  • From: Jiri Vanek
• Re: WARNING: The pip package is not available, falling back to EasyInstall
  • From: Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
• Re: Backports of fixes from F32 -> F31?
  • From: Florian Müllner
• Re: Untouched BZ against cinnamon-desktop
  • From: Dan Book
• Re: Taskotron is EOL today
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• rpminspect Copr repo location
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: WARNING: The pip package is not available, falling back to EasyInstall
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: Backports of fixes from F32 -> F31?
  • From: Ty Young
• Re: Untouched BZ against cinnamon-desktop
  • From: L S
• Re: WARNING: The pip package is not available, falling back to EasyInstall
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Backports of fixes from F32 -> F31?
  • From: Martin Jackson
• WARNING: The pip package is not available, falling back to EasyInstall
  • From: Luke Hinds
• Re: Backports of fixes from F32 -> F31?
  • From: Alex Scheel
• Re: Backports of fixes from F32 -> F31?
  • From: Josh Boyer
• Re: Backports of fixes from F32 -> F31?
  • From: Josh Boyer
• Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot via devel
• Re: Co-Maintainers wanted for python-lockfile EPEL branches
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Call for testers for rpmautospec in staging
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Untouched BZ against cinnamon-desktop
  • From: Michal Schorm
• Fedora-Cloud-32-20200430.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora-Cloud-31-20200430.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)
  • From: Petr Šabata
• Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)
  • From: Petr Šabata
• Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)
  • From: Petr Šabata
• Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)
  • From: Petr Šabata
• Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot via devel
• Fedora-Cloud-30-20200430.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot via devel
• Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot via devel
• [Test-Announce] Taskotron is EOL today
  • From: Kamil Paral
• Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
  • From: Markku Korkeala
• Re: Backports of fixes from F32 -> F31?
  • From: Ty Young
• Re: Retired packages in Fedora are now disabled in bugzilla
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• Re: Backports of fixes from F32 -> F31?
  • From: Alexander Ploumistos
• Re: Backports of fixes from F32 -> F31?
  • From: Josh Boyer
• Re: Retired packages in Fedora are now disabled in bugzilla
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Non-responsive maintainer check for hubbitus
  • From: David Schwörer
• Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Retired packages in Fedora are now disabled in bugzilla
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Retired packages in Fedora are now disabled in bugzilla
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Block discard on more things
  • From: Chris Adams
• Re: Backports of fixes from F32 -> F31?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Backports of fixes from F32 -> F31?
  • From: Artem Tim
• Re: Retired packages in Fedora are now disabled in bugzilla
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• Re: Backports of fixes from F32 -> F31?
  • From: Josh Boyer
• Re: Backports of fixes from F32 -> F31?
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Retired packages in Fedora are now disabled in bugzilla
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Retired packages in Fedora are now disabled in bugzilla
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: Backports of fixes from F32 -> F31?
  • From: Alex Scheel
• Backports of fixes from F32 -> F31?
  • From: Alex Scheel
• Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)
  • From: Colin Walters
• Re: Retired packages in Fedora are now disabled in bugzilla
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Fedora 32 is available now!
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot via devel
• Re: Retired packages in Fedora are now disabled in bugzilla
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Retired packages in Fedora are now disabled in bugzilla
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot via devel
• Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot via devel
• Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot via devel
• Re: Retired packages in Fedora are now disabled in bugzilla
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)
  • From: Kalev Lember
• Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Retired packages in Fedora are now disabled in bugzilla
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: Retired packages in Fedora are now disabled in bugzilla
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Retired packages in Fedora are now disabled in bugzilla
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot via devel
• Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
  • From: Michael Catanzaro
• Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Fedora 32 is available now!
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Orphaned uglify-js
  • From: Jun Aruga
• Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: ckermit?
  • From: Steven A. Falco
• Re: ckermit?
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: Orphaned uglify-js
  • From: Alexander Bokovoy
• Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)
  • From: Tomas Orsava
• Re: Orphaned uglify-js
  • From: Alexander Bokovoy
• Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
  • From: Martin Kolman
• Orphaned uglify-js
  • From: Jun Aruga
• Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Fedora-Cloud-31-20200429.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora-IoT-32-20200429.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora-Cloud-32-20200429.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Self Introduction: Iago Rubio
  • From: Iago Rubio
• Fedora-Cloud-30-20200429.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
  • From: Kalev Lember
• Fedora-IoT-33-20200429.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Interest in a GraphQL SIG?
  • From: Stephen Coady
• Re: python2-dns without DNSSEC support in rawhide
  • From: Alexander Bokovoy
• Re: python2-dns without DNSSEC support in rawhide
  • From: Lumir Balhar
• Re: python2-dns without DNSSEC support in rawhide
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
  • From: Peter Hanecak
• Re: ckermit?
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: I say thanks for another release (F32)
  • From: Benjamin Kircher
• python2-dns without DNSSEC support in rawhide
  • From: Lumir Balhar
• Re: bodhi: stuck updates
  • From: Alexander Ploumistos
• Re: Block discard on more things
  • From: James Cassell
• Re: Feedback on default partitioning and encryption
  • From: Chris Murphy
• ckermit?
  • From: Steven A. Falco
• Block discard on more things
  • From: Chris Adams
• Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Feedback on default partitioning and encryption
  • From: Simo Sorce
• Re: Feedback on default partitioning and encryption
  • From: David Kaufmann
• Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: Fedora 32 is available now!
  • From: Michael Catanzaro
• Re: Feedback on default partitioning and encryption
  • From: Michael Catanzaro
• Re: Feedback on default partitioning and encryption
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Fedora 32 is available now!
  • From: Alan
• Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Boost 1.73 upgrade
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: Feedback on default partitioning and encryption
  • From: Simo Sorce
• Re: Feedback on default partitioning and encryption
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: Fedora 32 is available now!
  • From: clime
• Re: bodhi: stuck updates
  • From: Clement Verna
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200428.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• bodhi: stuck updates
  • From: Alexander Ploumistos
• Re: Feedback on default partitioning and encryption
  • From: Simo Sorce
• I say thanks for another release (F32)
  • From: sixpack13
• Fedora-IoT-32-20200428.2 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Feedback on default partitioning and encryption
  • From: Michael Catanzaro
• Re: Fedora 32 is available now!
  • From: Ben Cotton
• RE: Fedora 32 is available now!
  • From: erich
• Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?
  • From: Steven Munroe
• Fedora 32 is available now!
  • From: Matthew Miller
• VMware NSX Engineer
  • From: uday field03
• Teletypewriter Installer
  • From: uday field03
• Fedora-IoT-32-20200428.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora-Cloud-31-20200428.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora-Cloud-32-20200428.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Please keep an eye on AskFedora as we approach F32 release
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Fedora-Cloud-30-20200428.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot via devel
• Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Re: Self Introduction: Jude Lee / judescripts
  • From: Robin Lee
• Re: Previous awesome background images
  • From: Jeremy Linton
• Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Self Introduction: Jude Lee / judescripts
  • From: Jude Lee
• Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)
  • From: clime
• Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)
  • From: clime
• FedoraRespin-31-updates-20200427.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
  • From: Martin Jackson
• Re: HEADS UP: repoquery --whatrequires yields incomplete results when run from Fedora 32+
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: HEADS UP: repoquery --whatrequires yields incomplete results when run from Fedora 32+
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• Re: f32-backgrounds look like crap
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
  • From: David Cantrell
• Logs for the Open NeuroFedora Meeting: 1800 UTC on Monday, 28th April
  • From: Aniket Pradhan
• Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?
  • From: Steven Munroe
• Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2020-04-27)
  • From: Aleksandra Fedorova
• Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?
  • From: Steven Munroe
• Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot via devel
• Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)
  • From: Daniel Mach
• Re: f32-backgrounds look like crap
  • From: José Abílio Matos
• Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?
  • From: Jun Aruga
• Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)
  • From: Petr Šabata
• Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?
  • From: Jun Aruga
• Node.js 14 in F33
  • From: Zuzana Svetlikova
• Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: dropping NSS DBM format support in F33+
  • From: Ondrej Mosnacek
• Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?
  • From: Dan Horák
• Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?
  • From: Dave Love
• Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?
  • From: Dave Love
• Unannounced soname bump: gecode
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)
  • From: Daniel Mach
• Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)
  • From: Daniel Mach
• Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)
  • From: Petr Šabata
• Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)
  • From: Petr Šabata
• Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)
  • From: Petr Šabata
• Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)
  • From: Petr Šabata
• Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)
  • From: Robin Lee
• Re: coreos-assembler v0.8.0
  • From: Micah Abbott
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200426.n.1 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• tuxanci-0.21.0 license corrected to GPL+
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Schedule for Mondays's FESCo Meeting (2020-04-27)
  • From: Aleksandra Fedorova
• Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)
  • From: Petr Šabata
• Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?
  • From: Jun Aruga
• Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)
  • From: Neal Gompa
• RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)
  • From: Petr Šabata
• Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?
  • From: Dave Love
• Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?
  • From: Dave Love
• Re: Fedora election schedule update
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Fedora-Cloud-32-20200427.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: CMake3-3.17.1 on EPEL7
  • From: Jun Aruga
• CMake3-3.17.1 on EPEL7
  • From: Antonio Trande
• Fedora-Cloud-31-20200427.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-26
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Fedora-Cloud-30-20200427.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Orphaned rubygem-ruby_parser and rubygem-gettext_i18n_rails
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Orphaned rubygem-ruby_parser
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Orphaned rubygem-ruby2ruby
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: dropping NSS DBM format support in F33+
  • From: Daiki Ueno
• Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-26
  • From: James Cassell
• Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-26
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-26
  • From: James Cassell
• Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-26
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?
  • From: Steven Munroe
• Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?
  • From: Dave Love
• Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?
  • From: Dave Love
• Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?
  • From: Jun Aruga
• Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?
  • From: Steven Munroe
• Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?
  • From: Samuel Sieb
• Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-26
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• NeuroFedora review swaps: python-sciunit and jneuroml-core
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• CPE Weekly: 2020-04-26
  • From: Aoife Moloney
• Fedora-Cloud-31-20200426.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Open NeuroFedora Meeting: 1800 UTC on Monday, 27th April.
  • From: Aniket Pradhan
• Non-responsive maintainer check for avesh
  • From: Emmanuel Seyman
• Fedora-Cloud-32-20200426.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Issue with booting on latest kernels (EFI_DISABLE_PCI_DMA related)
  • From: Dave Young
• Re: Accounts disabled in Bugzilla (ex-redhatters)
  • From: Miro Hrončok