On 08. 05. 20 22:17, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
When we wrote that, there was still ambiguity regarding whether DNF
would have implemented the necessary upgrade capabilities we've been
discussing for the last six months.
Just to clarify: DNF upgrade capabilities are not the thing that is holding back
default modules. It is somebody writing a policy wrt what we ship in modules and
what we don't.
From the ticket:
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2341#comment-627466
"""For Fedora 32 and onward, all default modular streams are banned. Existing
defaults are removed. Once a comprehensive modular policy for Fedora is created
and approved by FESCo, this ban can be lifted. The future policy should allow
modularizing, but the primary objective is to make sure that the user experience
and nonmodular packaging experience is not significantly worse than before
modularity."""
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
