\o Hey Jiri, I don't see two of our packages in the copr: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pki-core/ https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dogtag-pki/ Is there a way to know why they were excluded? Thanks! - Alex ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jiri Vanek" <jvanek@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Fedora Java Development List" > <java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2020 12:31:43 PM > Subject: F33 system wide change, java-11-openjdk as system jdk > > > > Hello fellow java package maintainers! > > We are planning to bump the JDK from java-1.8.0-openjdk to java-11-openjdk > for F33. Please see > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11 > > Short Story: > * if you have some java package, be aware that we are bumping JDK in rawhide > * Ensure your package builds and runs fine with JDK11 (see the > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jvanek/java11/builds/) > * there is special tooling ready for this, before mass rebuild is launched > ** See > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11#copr_preliminary_rebuild > * If you do not want Fedora rotten with JDK8 for ever, continue reading > > Long Story: > We ran a preliminary mass rebuild of javastack in copr repo > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jvanek/java11/builds/ (select "all" > instead of "25" at the > bottom), on packages requiring java,javac, java-devel, maven-local, ant, ivy > & comp for build. You > can see, the result was quite dramatic: > 1225 total; attempted to rebuild > 483 failed; from those 191 are trivial failures (but if you fix it, there > is no guarantee real > troubles are not hidden behind that) > 186 succeeded > 556 orphans or dead or otherwise tragic so the build did not even start > > I would kindly ask you to search yourself in this list: > https://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/java11/people > If you are here, please check status of your package in > https://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/java11/init > (pain text of https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jvanek/java11/builds). > * If your package is "succeeded", congratulations nothing to do, and just > keep en eye on JDK bump > * If there is "failed" but contains "- -" then it is probably orphan. If > you wish to resurrect it, > please ensure it runs against JDK11 (see lower) > * If there is "failed" but failed in "seconds", then those packages failed > so quickly, that the > build was in initial phases. That usually mean that you build with > source/target lower then 1.6 > JDK11 supports 1.6 and up. We recommend to bump the source/target to 1.8, to > allow existence of > compact 1.8 packages alongside main javastack. See > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11#Wrong_source.2Ftarget_version. > Don't forget to > upstream the patch, or maybe it is enough to update to more fresh upstream > release which supports > JDK11? it may happen, that after the fix, your build will fail in more > terrible way (see below) > * If there is "failed", and its none of above, then your package simply > failed. Very often the > scary error may be fixed by bump to latest upstream version. JDK 11 is out > for several years. > Please, try to fix the package. Don't hesitate to ask on > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx or > java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx or directly to me jvanek@xxxxxxxxxx. If you fix > the fail, feel free to > share your fix, it may help others. > We are trying to gather the most common issues at > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11#common_issues_packagers_can_face_and_gathered_solutions > . > Feel free to enhance the page, or write us your case (possibly both with > solution and without) so > we can add it here. > > Debugging Your failures. > The copr repo we maintain, contains builds of java-11-openjdk as system JDK, > javapackages-tools > honoring that, and java-1.8.0-openjdk as non system JDK. Also it contains > successfully rebuilt > packages. You can directly use this copr repo in several ways. > * first glance on error. On > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jvanek/java11/builds/ find your > build (select "all" instead of "25" at the bottom), > ** Click its number, select chroot (currently fedora-32-x86_64 ) and check > the logs. Main log is > build.log.gz. > * anything you push to rawhide, will automatically rebuild here in f32 > chroot (we have a JDK in > rawhide broken a bit currently) > ** It is the best approach. If you can fix your package in rawhide directly, > without breaking the > rawhide too much, go for it > ** If yo need to experiment, I have a mock config for you (generated from > copr-cli mock-config > jvanek/java11 fedora-32-x86_64) which you can copy to your /etc/mock and use > - > https://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/java11/jvanek-java11-fedora-32-x86_64.cfg . > Eg: > > sudo cp downloaded-fedora-32-x86_64.cfg > /etc/mock/jvanek-java11-fedora-32-x86_64.cfg > # change spec, bump sources, apply patches > fedpkg srpm > mock -r jvanek-java11-fedora-32-x86_64 *.src.rpm > > Or any other packaging workflow you use, and you can use against the copr > repo. > Thank you very much for your help, there are 500 failures, and 1000 java > packagers, but only 2 > active members of java sig. Without your help, the JDK bump will be very > hard. > > Thank You! > > > On behalf of Fedora java group > J. > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
