* Pierre-Yves Chibon: > On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 08:39:19PM +0200, clime wrote: >> But I would like to note that exploded repos (or source-git repos) >> have at least two other advantages. >> >> 1) they consume less space than tarballs for each version because >> objects in git repo are deduplicated >> 2) instead of downloading/uploading tarballs, you can just do >> something like: git pull --rebase upstream master; git push > > Just a note that this is not something you can do today since a rebase rewrite > history, so you would have to do `git push --force` which isn't allowed > currently. > So if we were to move forward with this model, we will need to find a solution > for the question that has led us to forbid force pushes until now. You could do a fake merge (git merge -s ours) to include the old master branch in the history, so that from a Git perspective, it's again a fast-forward push. I'm more concerned that a standard git rebase will not produce great results, producing a history that contains the new upstream version with a bit of cruft on top of it, only some of it actually needed. But it is worth a try. Thanks, Florian _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx