Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 01:03, Ken Dreyer <ktdreyer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 4:29 PM clime <clime@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Probably there are more variants but I see these three right now. I
> > think variants 1 and 2 where the spec file is kept in dist-git but
> > patches can be in source-git are more within our reach right now (but
> > I might be wrong, variant 3 is also interesting).
>
> I think the best approach is to try your ideas on many different real
> Fedora packages from many different upstreams, and refine the tools as
> you go, documenting what works and what doesn't. Tools like tito and
> rdopkg have the advantage of having been tested and hardened across
> many different packages, Fedora releases, and RHEL versions.

Yes, that's true but I think currently these tools assume the unpacked
repo is outside of Fedora dist-git and import of the exported tarball
into Fedora's git lookaside cache is needed. But I think we can
optimize on this once the unpacked/source-git repos will be inside
Fedora dist-git because we can use git submodules to link to them
directly. Maybe at some point git submodules didn't have the best
reputation? I remember something like this but in the present day, I
think they are already heavily tried&tested and something we could
include into our workflow. So that's something worth looking at too
:).

But I think it's great that we have all these options like packit,
rdopkg, tito, rpkg.

>
> In relation to rdopkg, I forgot to mention that Debian's
> git-buildpackage tool uses a patch management model that is almost
> identical to rdopkg for RPMs. Debian packagers create "patch-queue"
> branches from the upstream project, and git-buildpackage can write out
> a quilt-formatted series of .patch files into the debian packaging. It
> is pretty fast to manage a large series of downstream patches this
> way, rebase to new versions, etc.
>
> - Ken
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux