On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 11:35:42AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 04. 05. 20 7:59, Milan Crha wrote: > > Hi, > > out of the interest (no offense meant), would this not be caught by the > > rawhide gating? I'd expect that this is something what the rawhide > > gating would avoid. Of course, it expects reasonably good gating tests > > for the package(s), there's no doubt, but in this particular case, > > where hundreds of packages failed to build, even for a single > > architecture... > > It would be cool, if the CI supported anything but x86_64, yet that is > considered low priority: > > https://pagure.io/fedora-ci/general/issue/16 Note, gcc during package build performs almost 1 million tests, so it isn't getting untested into the distro, but in this case it was a packaging bug where the spec file tweaks weren't adjusted for the 2019-09-19 Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@xxxxxxxxxx> * config.host: Add t-lse to all aarch64 tuples. 2019-09-06 Jim Wilson <jimw@xxxxxxxxxx> * config.host (riscv*-*-linux*): Add t-slibgcc-libgcc to tmake_file. changes where on those two arches libgcc_s.so wasn't a linker script before; so it didn't get caught up in the %check which doesn't use installed testing. And then somebody unhelpfully pushed the F32 packages into an errata which weren't intended as an errata (wanted to wait until GCC 10.1 final this week). Jakub _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
