Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Mon, May 4, 2020, at 11:05 AM, Tomas Tomecek wrote:

> In the packit project, we work in source-git repositories

There's really 3 options:

- dist-git as it exists today (what we thought made sense in the days of CVS converted into git without much re-engineering)
- source-git (used in Debian at least in some places)
- OpenEmbedded-style "converged" git repos

I personally much prefer the OpenEmbedded style as a default; see:
https://github.com/openembedded/openembedded-core/tree/master/meta

For most language packaging it' d be way saner e.g. a specs-$lang like github.com/fedora/specs-rust and github.com/fedora/specs-golang than to move from what we have now to source git.

Among other things, adding e.g. 3 packages at one can be done as a single pull request and tested as a unit.

Plus, they could share code directly in the git repo (as happens with OE/bitbake) rather than sharing code via packaging RPM macros.

Source git I could see for things where we basically need to fork and the upstream is complex; kernel/systemd perhaps.  
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux