On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 4:40 AM Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, May 2, 2020 at 4:33 AM Christopher <ctubbsii@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Those are bugs filed against RPM. Is the RPM package responsible for > > executing lsetfilecon, or is it the grub2 package? If the grub2 > > package, it seems to me that they should know that EFI partitions will > > never support lsetfilecon and they should never try. If it's RPM, then > > it looks like it is suppressed upstream and the fix will be > > incorporated eventually. I guess I don't know which component is > > actually responsible for causing the execution of lsetfilecon. > > You're right, but there is discussion of the grub2 issue in bug > 1722766. A number of bugs have been filed against grub2 specifically: > Nothing in the grub2 package executes restorecon for the files in /boot/efi. The problem is that rpm calls lgetxattr() for each entry in %files, regardless if the filesystem supports extended attributes or not: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722766#c43 https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/976 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1819817 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827922 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829137 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830399 > > So far, though, no word from the maintainer on those bugs. I've been closing as duplicates of #1722766 but we are just getting too many bugs filed for this issue. Best regards, Javier _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
